Oregon
Information for Employees,
and Applicants for Employment


This page provides summary information that may be useful to employees and applicants for employment. Please note that only basic information is provided about each topic. This information should be supplemented with information from other sources, government agencies, and attorneys.

CONTENT

1. IF YOU SUSPECT EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION

2. TIME LIMITS, AND COMPLAINT-FILING PROCEDURES

3. REALITY CHECK

4. "SELF-HELP" TECHNIQUES

5. BROAD DISCOVERY OF EVIDENCE

6. NON-RETALIATION

7. AGENCY CONTACTS

----------

1. IF YOU SUSPECT EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION

If you feel that you may have experienced unlawful employment discrimination, the following steps may be helpful to you.

a. Gather Information - Create a file, and gather information regarding the suspected discrimination. The information may include the relevant laws and regulations; the employer's employment policies; the procedures to file a compaint with a government agency, and the employer's internal complaint procedures; personnel records; a list of witnesses; and, a log of important events. Visit a local law library, and book store, to review books that contain information about non-discrimination in employment.

b. Seek Advice - Consult with persons about the employment problem, and your legal rights. Information may be available within the employment environment from sources including the human resources department, the employee assistance program, employee organizations, and higher management. Information may be available outside of the employment environment from sources including government agencies, employee rights organizations, and attorneys. Be aware that the employment problem may involve other legal issues in addition to employment discrimination.

c. Meet Statutory Time Limits - Learn the time limits that you must meet if you decide to file an administrative complaint with a government agency, and / or to pursue litigation. Make notations of the deadlines on your calendars, and make additional notations to ensure that you have sufficient lead time to meet the deadlines. Be certain that you meet the time limits for filing administrative and court complaints, or you may lose your right to pursue the matter further.

d. Decide On and Follow a Course of Action - Using the information and advice you have obtained, decide on a course of action that you will follow to address the suspected discrimination. The appropriate course of action will depend on the circumstances of the suspected discriminatory situation. It may be helpful to first try to resolve the matter within the employment environment, by bringing the matter to the attention of someone in the human resources department, or in higher management. If that is not successful, you may decide to file a complaint with the employer's internal complaint or grievance system, if one exists. Recent court decisions regarding sexual harassment indicate that employees should usually take advantage of an employer's internal complaint system. Consider keeping notes on the contacts that you make orally, and making important contacts in writing. If you conclude that your efforts within the employment environment are not successful, you may decide to seek outside assistance by filing a complaint with a government agency, or retaining an attorney to represent you. Revise your plan of action as appropriate as you learn additional information about your case.

e. Identify the Desired Resolution - Using the information and advice you have obtained, decide on what you desire as a remedy for the suspected discrimination. The appropriate resolution will depend on the circumstances of the suspected discriminatory situation. Be prepared to explain, and justify, the resolution that you desire. Revise the desired resolution as appropriate as you learn additional information about the case. Be creative when thinking of possible resolutions. Recognize that compromise may be necessary to achieve a successful resolution.

Return to Content

2. TIME LIMITS AND COMPLAINT-FILING PROCEDURES

Equal employment opportunity laws impose various time limits that must be met. If prescribed time limits are not met, cases may be dismissed by government agencies, and the courts. The information presented here describes some, but not all, of the time limits. Other employment laws impose additional time limits. To obtain more information about time limits and complaint procedures, contact other sources, government agencies, or attorneys.

In Oregon, which has a state fair employment practices ("FEP") agency approved by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), complaints of employment discrimination must usually be filed in writing with the EEOC within 300 days of the alleged discrimination (42 USC 2000e-5(e)). If this state did not have an approved FEP agency, a 180-day time limit may apply.

A complaint of employment discrimination usually has to be filed with the EEOC, and a Notice of Right to Sue issued, before litigation is commenced in court. This is not true for litigation under the federal Equal Pay Act which may be filed directly in court within two years of the alleged discrimination (or three years for a "willful" violation)(29 USC 216(c), 255(a)), and litigation under post-Civil War civil rights statutes like 42 USC Sections 1981 and 1983, which may be filed within the statute of limitations for personal injury actions in the state where the case is filed (two years in Oregon).

If the EEOC declines to take a complaint, a complainant may attempt to file the complaint by submitting a signed letter to the EEOC within the prescribed time period, stating the name and address of the complainant and the employer, employment agency, or labor organization; the approximate number of workers employed by the employer; the date of the alleged discrimination; the basis of the alleged discrimination (e.g., race, national origin, sex, age, religion, disability, retaliation); and, a description of the alleged discriminatory actions (42 USC 2000-e-5(b); 29 CFR 1601.9 and 1601.12). The EEOC may still dismiss the complaint, but it should do so by issuing a Notice of Right to Sue, which allows the complainant to file suit in Federal District Court.

If the EEOC issues a Notice of Right to Sue on a complaint, that action usually ends the EEOC's administrative processing of the complaint, and the complainant has 90 days to file suit in Federal District Court (29 CFR 1601.28(e)).

Attorney referral services may be provided by government agencies, bar associations, and other organizations. The EEOC field offices maintain attorney referral lists that are available to the public. If a complainant is unable to find an attorney who will file suit within the 90-day period, (s)he may attempt to file suit in Federal District Court, and ask the court to appoint an attorney. Some courts may provide limited assistance to unrepresented complainants. For example, the Office of the Clerk of the Federal District Court for the Northern District of California will provide a package of forms to assist a complainant to file suit without an attorney. However, it is difficult to pursue litigation without an attorney, and the court may be unable to appoint an attorney for every unrepresented complainant. Also, there may be advantages for complainants to have their cases filed in state court, instead of federal court. For example, in Federal Court a unanimous jury verdict is required, whereas only three-fourths of the jury have to agree in some state courts.

Different complaint-filing time limits and administrative procedures apply to most civilian employees and applicants of the federal government, who must first discuss their discrimination complaints with equal employment opportunity counselors of the employing agency within 45 days of the alleged discrimination. The counselors should inform the employees and applicants of subsequent time limits that they must meet.

In Oregon, complaints of employment discrimination usually must be filed with the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industry, Civil Rights Division (BOLI), within one year of the alleged discrimination (ORS 659.040). After BOLI dismisses a complaint and issues a Right to Sue Letter, the complainant has 90 days to file suit in state court (ORS 659.095). In Oregon, a complainant has the option of first filing an administrative complaint with BOLI, or bypassing BOLI and commencing state court action within one year of the alleged discrimination (ORS 659.121).

The time limits to file discrimination complaints may be extended in some circumstances, such as continuing violations. If the you have questions regarding the timeliness of a discrimination complaint, contact the EEOC or BOLI, or seek professional advice from an employment law attorney.

Return to Content

3. REALITY CHECK

You will make better decisions concerning your employment situation, if you consider the practical realities and difficulties in pursuing an employment discrimination case.

Some complainants may develop unrealistic expectations about the monetary value of their cases, as a result of publicity about other cases where large amounts of money were awarded. What they may not consider adequately is that for each case where a large amount of money was won, there were more cases where small amounts of money were recovered, or the cases were unsuccessful.

Some complainants may expect employers to settle discrimination cases quickly due to fear of publicity. But some employers believe that if they settle discrimination cases easily, it will encourage more employees to complain of discrimination. Complainants should consider that litigation is expensive, and that they may not be able to find attorneys who will take their cases on contingency agreements, and also pay the litigation expenses.

Some complainants may not adequately consider what may be legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for the employment actions that they challenge. In most cases, there are facts and arguments to support both of the opposing parties, and the issues are ultimately decided by judges or juries who may reach different conclusions. It is difficult to predict with certainty how particular cases will be decided in court.

This reality check is not intended to discourage complainants from pursuing discrimination cases, but rather is intended to encourage them to carefully and realistically evaluate all aspects of their cases, including strengths and weaknesses, and monetary value. Since complainants are usually under duress from their employment problems, it is advisable for them to consult with other persons about the best course of action to follow.

Return to Content

4. "SELF-HELP" TECHNIQUES

Sometimes complainants use "self-help" techniques that they think will help their discrimination cases, but which actually hurt their cases later. For example, courts have held that some complainants who have falsified employment records, or taken restricted employment records without authorization, may not be entitled to full damages or reinstatement. Other complainants have tape recorded conversations not knowing that the recordings may be inadmissible as evidence if they were made in violation of law. Oregon law prohibits recording an in-person conversation, unless all participants are informed (ORS 165.540(1)(c)), and prohibits recording a telephone or radio communication unless one participant gives consent (ORS 165.540(1)(a), and 165.543(1)). Complainants should be cautious about using questionable "self-help" techniques. Complainants should consider other ways to preserve evidence, and seek legal advice if they feel that the evidence is important.

Return to Content

5. BROAD DISCOVERY OF EVIDENCE

Evidence that is created by a party in a discrimination case may usually be discovered by the opposing party in litigation, and other proceedings. This evidence may include things that a party may not expect to be disclosed, like notes, calendars, electronic mail, and computer files. The scope of questioning in depositions is also broad. There are privileges that may protect some evidence from disclosure; for example, communications with attorneys that are covered by the attorney-client privilege. Complainants should consider seeking legal advice if they have questions about evidence.

Return to Content

6. NON-RETALIATION PROVISIONS

Equal employment opportunity laws provide that employers may not retaliate because a person files a discrimination complaint; participates, assists or testifies in an investigation or litigation; or, opposes discriminatory employment practices (e.g., 42 USC 2000e-3; 29 USC 215(a)(3)). Alleged retaliation may include actions like discharge, demotion, harassment, or negative employment references. Complainants who experience retaliation should contact the appropriate enforcement agencies, because the agencies will probably require the filing of additional retaliation complaints within the prescribed time limit.

Return to Content

7. GOVERNMENT AGENCY CONTACTS

Government agencies have staff who will answer questions from the public. These agencies are a good source of information about the laws that they administer. Their staff are busy, so you may have to continue to call until you reach someone who will answer your questions.

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission - Call 1-800-669-4000 to be connected with the EEOC office nearest to you.

U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division - San Francisco (415) 744-5088; Sacramento (916) 979-2045; Glendale (213) 894-6845; San Diego (619) 557-6375; and, Portland, Oregon (503) 326-3052.

Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, Civil Rights Division - 1-503-731-4074.

Some government agencies have web sites that you may reach through the links on the Government Agencies and Programs page of this web site. The Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, Civil Rights Division, opened its new web site in July 1998.

Home| Laws| Government| Decisions| Employer| Employee| News| Welcome